Although the policies of Wikipedia strongly espouse verifiability and a neutral point of view, critics of Wikipedia prosecute it of systemic bias and inconsistencies (including undue weight given to popular culture),[11] and allege that it favors consensus over credentials in its editorial processes.[12] Its reliableness and accuracy are also targeted.[13] Other criticisms center on its susceptibility to vandalism and the addition of spurious or unverified information,[14] though scholarly work suggests that vandalism is generally short-lived,[15][16] and an investigation in Nature found that the science articles they compared came close to the level of accuracy of Encyclopædia Britannica and had a similar rate of serious errors.[17] Wikipedias exit from the expert-driven style of the encyclopedia If you want to get a enough essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment