Effect of Presidential Debates

Presidential debate watch affects voter choice.

The researchers argon looking for positive relationships in only in all of these hypotheses, which are non competing.

Knowledge of candidates' issue stands

The number of issues apply to evaluate candidates

Preference for one candidate's position over another

Perceptions of the congress importance of issues

Perceptions of candidates' character

Perceptions of candidates' competence

Independent variables include: whether the viewers were students or not, whether the respondents had viewed all of the debates or just one, and how many days there were amongst the debates and the election.

Control variables include sample size, as well as reading about the nature of the study being include. This information included which campaign or debate was studied, whether the study included students, whether the study included polling data, and whether the design was pre tribulation post test or post test only.

5. The hypotheses are general and plausible, though not overly empirical. The variables are measured in the studies by dint of the use of qualitative questionnaires and then coded. The population includes the public that viewed the presidential debate that year. The hypotheses include the basic assumptions made by governmental strategists as they prepare candidates for a debate, as such they are valuable questions to ask

7. This study is a meta-analysis. This means that the data collected was actually parsed out of a number of different randomized controlled trials of debate viewing.

As antecedently take downed, the reviewers coded nine studies together to refine their coding procedures. They then canvass the studies using these procedures to monitor the effects each study showed for those variables. The researchers do not appear to mention validity outright, though they do suggest that some of the studies reviewed had larger sample sizes and are olibanum more reliable. But they do not mention whether this was quantified into a control variable or not. They also do not mention some of the internal validity issues involved with their let meta analysis. They mention the joint coding, but do not ruin details about how the coding proceeded afterwards. They do not mention if they conducted any checks to see whether their coders were in fact sticking to the procedures. Additionally, the fact that for some of their hypotheses, only three or four studies could be used for the analysis may present a good threat to the validity of their result for those variables a fact the authors acknowledge.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.