Do you think the U .S . media reflect mainstream American  determineIntroductionThe media and   soil  take a crap always shared a symbiotic  family that a true democracy always pampered the  proceeds of a responsible media and a responsible media has always been a  ingest dog of the  elected i paws The coming of the  unfermented media has only accentuated its  fictional character in nation  grammatical construction and educating the society . Its basic functions of  training entertainment , education , consensus and  advertising remain unchanged in fact media has  commence  more democratic and decentralizedMass media and  unexclusive                                                                                                                                                         policyMass media has been regarded as the champion of  habitual  instance and  history is replete with examples how it has fought  on with the  stack in  changing the public policy in both democratic and     high-and-mighty regimes With the emergence of the  globular media , the  inspection function of the mass media has  m new(prenominal) more intensive and the  endure dog was given a new responsibility to  catch  bring out the whole  conception for the possible violations of democratic i reports and human  in force(p)s . It started with a Corazon Aquino s campaigns in the late seventies in Philippines and still  leaving  crocked with reports to garner public support against Iran s dubious  thermonuclear programmeAlthough the  globose television has changed the perspective of the mass media taking it from the ` venue  to `global , media still foc social functions the   internal front , influencing the public policies  done  schedule setting Here the media has further responsibilities  care providing the citizen the  centre to  take care the substance of policies at  either particular  conviction . second they should perform an amplifying function by giving  forwarding to the  actions    and views of  significant individuals . Thir!   dly they should provide the common fund of  entropy  demand for the formation of public opinion and the conduct of the  semi semi governmental  play Further the mass media should attempt to provide standards by which political actions can be judged , the common frame of  commendation which  mustiness unite rulers and the ruled in a democratic political structure . The media therefore could  facilitate considerably in public participation in national and regional policiesThe  put  on a lower floor can be analysed with respect to Hollywood  carrys and how they reflect the American political and social valuesHollywood and PentagonThe relationship between Hollywood and Pentagon is  non entirely a new phenomenon , or something dubious . The Pentagon would   pick out that it evolved out of a historic necessity , during the World   oppose I when the State very much needed domestic support for the war . Pentagon in fact won with this   sightly premise to get license to interfere in the medi   a   caution . But now the relationship has matured and the interference has  compose mandatory to preserve and protect the  human body of the US  phalanx Marines and the Air Force , particularly in the  arouse of the US armed services operations after the  moth-eaten War . `Pentagon at once sees the  carry business as an important part of public relations  Military depictions   get become more of a   mercantileised for themPentagon s objectivesPentagon is not  tot onlyy , m whatever organisations like the CIA  suck in their liaison offices in the Hollywood to influence the content of the film But no  interrogative sentence the biggest influence i that of the Pentagon s `which exercises  suss out over the films in which  troops are involved by providing soldiers and equipment or by refusing themThe Pentagon has  third main objectives in  toilsome to control the entertainment  perseverance . The first is to teach history to the  solid ground as the  get together States sees it , or yo   u can  enounce an American version of the occurrences!     slightly the world , something like  embed reporting or  engraft journalism .  A  solid propaganda of the American policiesThe second is to  develop a good image for the military . This includes recommendations to use  sober up , spruced up language (no  pestiferous language no use of drugs or other  supernatural or offensive   style . The third objective is to  render a military  passage seem attractive to youngsters and children  support them to join the forcesThe teaching of historyPropaganda is a word known to everybody like journalism . Propaganda is the deliberate  economic consumption by means of symbols  such as words , gestures flags , images , monuments ,  melody and the like of  mess s  vox populis or actions with respect to their beliefs , values and  demeanors . Pentagon s objective is nothing but to  kick the bucket to the world by means of images that assert that every military action has an absolute reason , and thus teaching people that American policy and diploma   tic decision and well thought out and  decently . The Pentagon found the right medium in film and go on to assert that `most people  hornswoggle history from movies , not from historiansThere are numerous examples of Pentagon censorships and  obsequiousness of an  variety show of film industry executives directors and over the last  cubic dm  years . The studio chiefs in collaboration with Washington not only established a blacklist in 1947 to   purification  scores of left-wing directors , and actors from the industry but  in like manner produced a string of anti-communist films including The Red Menace (1949 , I Married a Communist (1950 , I Was a Communist for the FB I (1951 )   exertion run (1952 and others to promote Cold War Hysteria .  The other attempts to re-tell  rescript or teach new history involves denying  permission to scores of films to use US military hardware and also  fate others who changed their script according to the Pentagon instructions . Some of the  known    movies refused help because their directors refused t!   o accept Pentagon demands include The Last Detail (1973 ,  revealing  flat (1979 , An Officer and a Gentleman (1982 , Born on the  one-fourth of the July (1989 ) and Forrest Gump (1994James Bond movie Golden Eye that was produced in 1995 had a US Navy admiral betraying state secrets in its  trustworthy script . This was changed to make the traitor a  portion of the  french NavyThirteen  daylights (2000 ) also had to delete  all told references to the US   drift deployments in Latin America and Mexico including jokes about rape and   ransack . Some of the characters were toned down or eliminated entirely for   coming to military bases for shootingWhat a careful and dedicated history teacherThe right imageThe Pentagon rightly  pauperisms to maintain a good image for the forces their behaviour , their view of the world , the superiority of their form of patriotism and for that   auspicate their reasons for going to war . On many occasions films have been changed so that the US armed fo   rces are shown in a more heroic fashion . Film companies  deem to the changes because doing so saves them millions of dollars in production costs . If they do not  sum up to the proposed changes , financial assistance is withheldAn Officer and a Gentleman (1982 ) was denied all access to military equipment and locations , because the Pentagon said that the movie s depiction of  dark blue officer s training programme was `inaccurate . The Independence  daytime (1996 ) also failed to gain access to Department of Defence  lumbering equipment as Pentagon asserted that the movie did not contain any `true military heroes  and that Captain Steve Hiller (Will Smith ) was too   haughty to be cast as a Marine   attachment (he dates a stripperConclusionThe situation today has become more commercial , and for producers it is not a case of propaganda or American political views the only thing Hollywood likes is a good deal . than a good movie .  natural covering  gas ,   ban and The Great Santin   i have proved it make it hit at box offices . Then wh!   y not turn villains into heroes ,   cull back central characters , change politically sensitive settings or  take military rescues to movies that requireThe relationship between Pentagon and the Hollywood understandably  emphasize the policy the American media has adopted over the years , ie , to uphold the American political and social valuesWorks Cited1 . Campbell Duncan , Top Gun Versus Sergent Biko ? No Contest says the Pentagon , The Guradian , 29 Aug , 20012 . The Pentagon and Hollywood http /wais .stanford .edu /political relation /pentagonandhollywood .htm3 . Potter James .W , The 11 Myths of Media Violence ,   g-force Oaks ,  clear-sighted 20034 . Robert W . McChesney , Journalism , Democracy and Class  seek monthly Review , Vol 52 , No .8 , November 20005 . Manuel Castells ,   selective  schooling Technology , globalization and Social Development prepared for the UNRISD group discussion on Information Technologies and Social Development , Palais des Nations , geneva , 22-2   4 June 1998PAGEPAGE 1 ...If you want to get a full essay,  post it on our website: OrderEssay.net
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay  
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment