A position statement by the Emergency Nurses Association in 2001 re`ffirmed their 1893 resolution to support the option of the family being gratuity during invasive procedures and resuscitation (kiss of life) (Emergency, 2001). This was in recognition that the family plays a role, along with health bring off professionals, in patient care. However, since 1993, the ENA has found that very few emergency brake departments have a written policy for the presence of family members during CPR and invasive procedures, even though several studies have shown that the presence of family during these procedures gives them the assurance of knowing everything possible was being done for their love one; helps maintain the patient-family relationship; relieves anxiety and fear; brings pulley-block to the family on the patient's death; and facilitates the grieving process. Patients indicated that having their family present gives them comfort, helps them with pain view as and coping, and reminds healthcare workers that the patient was a person with a family, merit of dignity and respect (Emergency, 2001; Sanford, Pugh and Warren, 2002, 61-66).
The major objections to family presence have been: change magnitude stress on heal
MacLean et al (2003, 246-257) carried out a study to determine the policies, preferences, and practices of critical care and emergency nurses for having family members present when patients were receiving CPR or invasive procedures. They employ a 30-item survey which they mailed to a random consume of 1,500 members of AACN and 1,500 members of the ENA.
The survey was composed of 20 questions regarding the demographics of the responsive, 9 questions about the respondent's practices, preferences, and their hospital's policies associate to having the family present during CPR and invasive procedures, and an open-ended question for the respondent to share comments about their personal or professional familiaritys with having the family present during these procedures.
In surveying healthcare professionals, it was found that 85 per centum feel comfortable with having family present in the emergency department, and 97 percent said the relatives behaved appropriately (AHA, 2000). This should dispel the fears of many healthcare professionals that the presence of family members in such situations could be disruptive, obstructive, and lead to lawsuits for malpractice from agitated relatives if the patient dies. No psychological problems were found in family members who were followed up two months later.
Within 72 hours of the procedure, each healthcare provider was given a survey to complete, and two months later, family members were asked to complete a survey (Families, 2000). The surveys asked questions about attitudes and experiences, benefits, or problems during the event. All 39 family members indicated the experience was beneficial to them and they would do it again. Ninety-five percent were comforted in knowing everything possible was being done for the patient, although many convey concern about the patient's pain, suffering, and odds for survival. The majority of physicians (79 percent) and nurses (96 percent) supported the family member presence. Sev
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment